Legal Opinion
H & H WAREHOUSE v. Vicory
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 25, 1990No. 89CA1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DUBOFSKY.
H & H Warehouse and Continental Western Insurance Company, petitioners, seek review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which concluded that claimant had sustained a com-pensable injury to his arm and awarded temporary disability benefits, medical benefits, and an amount for disfigurement. We affirm.
I
Petitioners argue that the employer is not liable under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) for the injury suffered by claimant. We disagree.
While claimant was at work, a door was suddenly and unexpectedly opened which startled him and caused…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Patel v. ThomasColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- International Vermiculite Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Gates Rubber Co. v. INDUSTRIAL COMM'N OF COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Claim of Calabretta v. LanorithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- 85 Sanchez v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- National Health Laboratories v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Duncan v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Leffler v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Youngquist Brothers Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.