Legal Opinion

Redfield v. . Holland Purchase Ins. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1874PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is claimed that the plaintiff, when the contract of insurance was made, had no insurable interest in the barn. He was, at that time, in possession of the land on which it stood, but his wife had the legal title. She acquired it by deed from one Jencks, dated November 25, 1868, to whom, on the same day, the plaintiff had conveyed the land without consideration, with the intent that he should immediately thereafter convey it to the wife. The real transaction was a conveyance of the land from the husband to her, and the deed to Jencks was interposed for the reason that the disability of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ryan v. . DoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Ryan v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Caldwell v. Carrington's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  4. Kirby v. SissonNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Phenix Ins. v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Rauen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. B. S. Rhea & SonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  5. Etterle v. Excelsior InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API