Legal Opinion

Cox-Hilstrom v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1997No. CA CR 96-563PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Keith Cox-Hilstrom appeals from a jury-trial conviction of theft of leased personal property and theft by deception, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of five years and three years, respectively, in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Appellant argues that the court erred in disallowing exculpatory testimony of a defense witness, in refusing appellant’s proposed jury instructions on theft of leased personal property, and in failing to direct a verdict on the charge of theft by deception. We affirm in part and reverse and dismiss in part.

On November…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Zinger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Branstetter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Flemister v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Iqbal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API