Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Insurance v. Arhelger

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1894No. Civil No. 380PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Gila. Joseph H. Kibbey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.

This suit was commenced by Edward Arhelger, administrator of the estate of Alexander Graydon, deceased, against the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York upon a life policy issued by the appellant to the appellee’s intestate. The case was tried before a jury, and a verdict *275rendered in favor of the appellee in the sum of $5,462.21. Judgment followed the verdict. The court denied a motion for a new trial, and the appeal is taken from the judgment and the order denying the new trial. The policy was issued to the deceased, Graydon, December 16, 1890, for the sum of five thousand dollars, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Dwight v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Boland v. Industrial Benefit Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Provident Sav. Life Assur. Soc. of New York v. LlewellynCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. McDermott v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Eklund v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Arhelger v. Mutual Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API