Legal Opinion

Krysztofel v. Krysztofel

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 15, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The parties are husband and wife, having been married on October 29, 1932. The motivating factor giving rise to the present litigation is the existence of long and continued marital difficulties between the parties who have lived separate and apart since 1943. This is the defendant's second marriage, her previous husband having died in 1930. At the time of her marriage to the plaintiff, defendant was the owner in fee of a dwelling house and lot of land in the Borough of East Rutherford, Bergen County. This property forms the subject matter of the suit. It is claimed by the plaintiff that part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stockton v. Central RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
  2. Rowley v. BowyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  3. Montgomery v. VarleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Builders Fair, Inc. v. YoumansNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API