Bankers Security Life Insurance Society v. Goldfarb
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meter, J.
The court has previously held that plaintiff insurer is not entitled to rescind a policy of insurance on the life of John Yocale and that Yocale’s widow, defendant Baumel, is entitled to recover on the policy. By stipulation defendant Goldfarb is to receive a proportionate part of the widow’s recovery. The question now presented is what the widow is entitled to recover.
The policy in question is a $20,000 ordinary life policy with double indemnity for accidental death and with family income benefit. The family income rider provides for payment of monthly income of $200 beginning one month from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crossman Co. v. RauchNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Libby v. RosekransNew York Supreme Court · 1869
- Matter of NiresNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gordon v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983