Legal Opinion

Bankers Security Life Insurance Society v. Goldfarb

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meter, J.

The court has previously held that plaintiff insurer is not entitled to rescind a policy of insurance on the life of John Yocale and that Yocale’s widow, defendant Baumel, is entitled to recover on the policy. By stipulation defendant Goldfarb is to receive a proportionate part of the widow’s recovery. The question now presented is what the widow is entitled to recover.

The policy in question is a $20,000 ordinary life policy with double indemnity for accidental death and with family income benefit. The family income rider provides for payment of monthly income of $200 beginning one month from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crossman Co. v. RauchNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Libby v. RosekransNew York Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Matter of NiresNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API