Legal Opinion

Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Sharit

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1937No. 6 Div. 85PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

A general averment in a count, that an injury was wantonly inflicted, or damage was wantonly caused, following proper averments of inducement showing that the defendant was under duty not to wantonly inflict'such injury or cause such damage, is sufficient. Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Jones, 146 Ala. 277, 41 So. 146; Southern Railway Co. v. Weatherlow, 153 Ala. 171, 44 So. 1019; Id., 164 Ala. 151, 51 So. 381; Barbour v. Shebor, 177 Ala. 304, 309, 58 So. 276; Harbison-Walker Refractories,. Company v. Scott, 185 Ala. 641, 64 So. 547; Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Woods, 201…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City Delivery Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  2. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co. v. DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Southern Bell Telephone Co. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. AbernathySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Barbour v. SheborSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Treadwell Ford, Inc. v. LeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Sibley v. OdumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Alabama Power Company v. RembertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Day v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API