Legal Opinion

Personal Discount Co. v. Lincoln Tire Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided March 3, 1949No. 3492PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MacNeille, P. J.,

We are considering defendants’ petition and rule to show cause why a judgment entered against them should not be opened.

On November 5, 1947, plaintiff, Personal Discount Company, caused judgment to be entered against defendants, Lincoln Tire Company and Harry Kravitz, individually and trading as Lincoln Tire Company, on the endorsement of four judgment notes executed by certain customers of defendants and sold and assigned to plaintiff for value with full recourse. Pursuant to the entrance of the judgment, plaintiff issued a writ of fieri facias upon the property of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Equitable Credit & Discount Co. v. GeierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Schuy'l T. Co. v. Sobolewski Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Equipment Finance, Inc. v. GrannasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API