Childers v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurrence
THOMAS,
Specially Concurring.
I concur in the court’s opinion. I write to express my view that even if the trial court erred by excluding the State’s Notice To Revoke Junior’s Plea Agreement, the error was harmless. See Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 106 S.Ct. 1431, 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986) (holding that cross examination errors are subject to harmless error analysis).
The Florida Supreme Court has held that:
The solemn obligation of the Court to perform an independent harmless error review and establish the analysis to be applied in performing that review is so critical to the appellate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Tompkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Larkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.