Legal Opinion

United States v. Article of Drug . . . "Mykocert."

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 19, 1972No. 71 C 235PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MAROYITZ, District Judge.

On January 29, 1971, subsequent to the filing of a Complaint For Forfeiture, the Plaintiff seized a quantity of the prescription drug, Mykocert medicated vaginal tampons pursuant to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. and now seeks a decree of condemnation in regard to the drug seized.

The Complaint alleges that the seized article of drug was misbranded while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce within the meaning of the Act, 21 U.S.C. as follows:

§ 352(a) in that its labeling, namely, the box label, contains statements which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. 41 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Amp Incorporated v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, and James L. Goddard, Commissioner of Food and DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Merritt Corporation v. FolsomDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
  4. United States v. 7 CARTONS, MORE OR LESS, ETC.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1968
  5. United States v. ARTICLE OF DRUG, ETC.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Articles of Drug Consisting of the Following: 5,906 Boxes, Etc., United States of America v. Alcon Laboratories (Puerto Rico), Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. The United States of America v. An Article of Drug . . . "Entrol-C Medicated", Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Articles of Drug, Etc. Appeal of the Lannett Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. X-Otag Plus TabletsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API