Pelham v. State

OPINION OF THE COURT

The matter on appeal was the trial court’s denial of Appellee’s[sic] Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis. The undersigned court reviewed the record and briefs filed in the cases and heard oral argument on December 27, 1990. The trial court’s denial of the Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis is affirmed.

*46This court believes State v Caudle, 504 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DC A 1987) is controlling. In Caudle the defendant filed a sworn motion stating he did “not recall being advised of his constitutional rights,” and did not add to that statement when he testified at the hearing.…