Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Hamill

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 1932No. [Nos. 20, 21, January Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

These appeals submit three questions: (1) May one, who is an heir at law, and also' a beneficiary under the unprobated will of a testator, and who has filed a caveat to' a later will of said testator, be required, as a condition precedent to prosecuting such caveat, to' elect whether he will prosecute it as a beneficiary under the earlier will or as an heir at law of the decedent; (2) whether a caveat to a will, filed by “the guardian and next friend” of an infant possessed of a caveatable interest therein, may be prosecuted as the caveat of the infant; and (3) whether either party to a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Pegg v. WarfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. Johnston v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Munnikhuysen v. MagrawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  5. Gross v. BurnestonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Quimby v. GreenhawkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  2. In Re Hicks' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Fidelity Trust Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Werner v. FrederickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  5. Ades v. NorinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API