Legal Opinion

Beebe v. Parker

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 26, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Action by Charles Beebe against Samuel Webber Parker. Plaintiff resides in New Jersey, but has an office in New York city for the transaction of business in person, and appeals from an order requiring him to file security for costs.

1Per curiam

There is no statute requiring a non-resident plaintiff to file security for costs, except that contained in sections 3268 and 3269 of the Code, which are limited, in their application to this court, as follows: “A plaintiff in an action brought in the court, who has an office for the regular transaction of business in person within the city of New York, is deemed a resident of that city, within the meaning of sections 3268 and 3269 of this act. ” Code § 3160. Those sections, in referring to the courts of record generally, refer to “non-residents of the state,” and in referring to this court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Glass v. PlaceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kokomo Straw Board Co. v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API