Legal Opinion · Dissent

Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Fitzpatrick

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 5, 1954No. 122, Docket 22881Published

1DissentClark, Circuit Judge

Judge Harlan’s careful and extensive research into the legislative background of the revenue law here involved serves in my judgment to afford strong support for both the reasoning and the decision in General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Higgins, 2 Cir., 161 F.2d 593, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 810, 68 S.Ct. 112, 92 L.Ed. 388, now largely repudiated in actual result. The narrow distinction of the statute between promissory notes, which are not subject to the stamp tax, and corporate debentures or certificates of indebtedness, which are, is not of our choosing and we have no authority to blot it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. FitzpatrickDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API