Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
J2FITZSIMMONS, Judge.
In these consolidated suits for contribution and indemnity, the trial court found that (1) Louisiana State University (LSU) did not exercise sufficient control over Andrew Erie Schroeder (Eric) to be hable for his negligent actions and (2) LSU did not borrow the Schroeder vehicle. Plaintiffs, Rolf Schroeder, Eric, and the intervenor, Continental Casualty Company (CNA), appealed. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In its reasons for judgment, the trial court outlined the background of the case and made the following findings of fact:
On Saturday, October 29, 1983,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whetstone v. DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- USF & G. v. German Auto, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi FraternityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Cason v. SanifordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Adams v. FRANCHISE FINANCE CORP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Hughes v. Bossier Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Robinson v. Whitney National BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.