Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1995No. Nos. 94 CA 0910, 94 CA 0909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J2FITZSIMMONS, Judge.

In these consolidated suits for contribution and indemnity, the trial court found that (1) Louisiana State University (LSU) did not exercise sufficient control over Andrew Erie Schroeder (Eric) to be hable for his negligent actions and (2) LSU did not borrow the Schroeder vehicle. Plaintiffs, Rolf Schroeder, Eric, and the intervenor, Continental Casualty Company (CNA), appealed. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In its reasons for judgment, the trial court outlined the background of the case and made the following findings of fact:

On Saturday, October 29, 1983,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whetstone v. DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. USF & G. v. German Auto, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi FraternityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Cason v. SanifordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Adams v. FRANCHISE FINANCE CORP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Hughes v. Bossier Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Robinson v. Whitney National BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API