Legal Opinion
In re De Nomme
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided May 27, 1914No. 1234PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of Henry De Nomme.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The bankrupt’s discharge is opposed on the ground that within four months preceding the filing of the petition the bankrupt, on February 17, 1913, transferred a stock of merchandise with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors. The transfer is proved by a bill of sale. As this was a sale in bulk, the provisions of the Bulk Saks Act of April 14, 1909 (Public Daws of Rhode Island, c. 387), were applicable.
Contemporaneously with the execution of the bill of sale, the bankrupt made affidavit that he had no creditors in connection with his dry goods business. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John P. Squire & Co. v. TellierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- In re HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cliftex Clothing Co. v. Di SantoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
- In re PetersDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1967
- Cliftex Clothing Co. v. Di SantoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
- In re AngardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923