Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Carlisle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1920No. 9623Published

Error from District Court, Craig County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by Rose Carlisle against Bethel Andrews, a minor, by guardian ad litem, S. P. Parks. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced by defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, in August, 1914. The parties will be referred to defendant in error as plaintiff, and plaintiff in error as defendant, the same position they occupied in the court below.

The defendant’s father and mother were both made parties to said cause of action, but the court found in favor of them and no cross-appeal has been taken, and they are not parties to this appeal, and will not be referred to in discussing the issues presented in this ease.

The petition alleged the defendant was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olsen v. HagenWashington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API