Legal Opinion

CULCLASURE v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01543Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL CULCLASURE : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 18-1543 : COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL : SECURITY ADMINISTRATION : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. June 15, 2020 Social Security claimant Michael Culclasure persuaded us to remand the Commissioner’s order denying him benefits because the Commissioner and the President did not properly appoint the administrative law judge who decided his case as required by the Appointments Clause. We did not follow Judge Hart’s reasoned Report and Recommendation we deny remand. We instead followed…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API