Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 21, 2014No. CR-13-0583Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJoiner, Judge

I concur in the Court’s judgment reversing Eric Devon Johnson’s conviction on the basis that, under the circumstances of this *169case, Johnson was entitled under § 13A-3-23(a)(1), Ala.Code 1975, to an instruction on self-defense. I dissent, however, from the main opinion’s apparent holding that Johnson was also entitled to an additional no-duty-to-retreat instruction under § 13A-3-23(b), Ala.Code 1975, because, in the main opinion’s view, under Ex parte Taylor, 636 So.2d 1246 (Ala.1993), Johnson’s codefendant Ellis Andrei Diggs2 was not engaged in “unlawful activity” when Diggs shot and killed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Kidd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. George v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  4. Diggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API