Legal Opinion

Denver Tofu Co. v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Denver District

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided October 9, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 81-K-407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment stating that defendant’s denial of a preference visa petition to plaintiff Shimada violated the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). All parties have moved for summary judgment. Briefs, affidavits, forms and the administrative record have been submitted. The motions are ripe for determination. This court has jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1329.

In April, 1977 plaintiff Denver Tofu submitted a Department of Labor (DOL) form MA 7-50B, “Job Offer for Alien Employment,” to the DOL. The offer was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nazario Castaneda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Singh v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  3. Paul Spyropoulos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  4. Stewart Infra-Red Commissary of Massachusetts, Inc. v. CoomeyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nooria Madany v. William French SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Rosedale & Linden Park Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  3. Goetz v. TordoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API