Abdur-Rashid v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
1Dissent
STEIN, J. (dissenting).
Whether, and to what extent, law enforcement agencies should be permitted, under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6 [FOIL] ), to issue "Glomar" responses (see Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency, 546 F.2d 1009, 1012 [D.C. Cir.1976] ) that refuse to confirm or deny the existence of requested records is a thorny question with strong competing public policy concerns on each side of the debate. However, this Court must look to New York's FOIL statute, as it is written and has been interpreted by our prior case law, to answer the question of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Larson v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Wolf v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Harriet Ann Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency and George H. Bush, Director, Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.