United States v. Michael Lee Bolick
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Michael Bolick has appealed his conviction for conspiring to sell, and selling, cocaine. Bolick’s primary contention is that the trial court impermissibly admitted prior consistent statements of government witnesses who had not yet been impeached. He also contends that the trial court impermissibly allowed the government to create a prejudicial “drug atmosphere” at trial under the guise of “background” evidence.
I
In early September 1987, undercover government agent D.C. Ramsey arranged to purchase an ounce of cocaine from Ray Samuel Dicks. Agent Ramsey had established…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. William RubinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ervin Jahue Blevins, United States of America v. Joel Amos Mitchell, United States of America v. Dewey Glen JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- United States v. A & S Council Oil Company Artice L. CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- State v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.