Legal Opinion
Pineda v. Irvin
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 16, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Final judgment, entered July 18, 2012, affirmed, with $25 costs.
The holdover eviction proceeding was properly dismissed after trial, in view of petitioners’ failure to meet their threshold burden of proving the petition’s allegations that the apartment premises sought to be recovered are exempt from rent stabilization coverage since the building that houses it is not a multiple dwelling. Indeed, the trial evidence shows to the contrary, there being no real dispute that the building is registered as a multiple dwelling and contains at least six residential units (see Wilson…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. One Ten Duane Street Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Hornfeld v. GaareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
4Cited by5 opinions
- 124 Meserole, LLC v. ReckoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- Edelstein LLC v. Rodriguez, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County2026
- Matter of Golden Horse Realty, Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Ortiz v. DharmnathAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2024
- TJA Realty, LLC v. HermosaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017