Legal Opinion

Cundiff v. Zachary's

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 12, 1833PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Nicholas

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

COMMISSIONERS who had been appointed by the Pulaski count]’' court, to settle the executorial accounts of the appellee, having reported a settlement, as made by them, CundifF, as one of the devisees of Zachary, appeared, and sought permission to resist a confirmation of the report, and to shew from the face of the report, the testator’s will and other evidence which he offered to introduce, that the settlement was incorrect and unjust. The court refused him permission to introduce his testimony, or otherwise to resist the confirmation of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. Branch Bank at DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  2. Lexington & Ohio Railroad v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  3. Masterson v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API