Legal Opinion

Doe v. Milwaukee County

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 31, 1990No. 89-2304PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

Child abuse is always a tragedy, and that tragedy is compounded when the abuse could have been prevented by timely intervention. Federal and state governments have increasingly devoted resources to prevent child abuse, but, unfortunately, the governmental measures devised do not always accomplish their goals. The minor plaintiffs in this case, S. and M. Doe,1 the children’s father, M.A. Doe, and their grandparents, V. Doe and E. Doe, charge that the Milwaukee County Department of Social Services (the “DSS”) violated federal and state law by failing to initiate an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Kevin Holcomb v. Mark Lykens, Sean Smith, Joanne Pereria and John GorczykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Phillip Wallace v. Merle Dean RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Sealed v. SealedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Maust v. HeadleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API