Legal Opinion · Dissent

Helgeson v. County of Hennepin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1986No. C2-85-1847Published

1DissentScott, Justice

I respectfully dissent. In holding that the Helgeson’s condominium is seasonal recreational property under Minn.Stat. § 273.13, subd. 4(a) (1984), the majority fails to consider legislative intent and adhere to prior case law.

In 1959, the legislature enacted a special property-tax classification for noncommercial parcels “devoted to temporary and seasonal residential occupancy for recreational purposes.” Act of April 18, 1959, ch. 338, *411§ 1, 1959 Minn.Laws 447. Tourism was, as it is today, an important industry in the state and the legislature, in enacting this tax break for noncommercial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Otis Lodge, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Lilja v. County of WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API