Lanz v. Lanz
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
Plaintiff in error was defendant and defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court, and will be referred to as they there appeared.
Plaintiff brought her action for separate maintenance and filed a motion for temporary support payments. Defendant was then and still is in the military service with a rank of Sergeant, 1st Class, and is entitled to a Class Q allotment, payable to his wife and three minor children. He receives as base pay $222.00 per month; $96.90 is paid by the Government toward the Class Q allotment and $80.00 of defendant’s pay is deducted for this purpose. Thus plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bieler v. BielerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Urling v. UrlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Zook v. ZookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Fitchett v. FitchettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
3Cited by1 opinion
- Samelson v. SamelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961