Legal Opinion
Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc. v. Baker
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1986No. 80 Civ. 5590 (RLC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, on March 19, 1986, renewed their motion for an order adjudging the United States Catholic Conference (“USCC”) and the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (“NCCB”) in civil contempt. In a letter dated March 6, 1986, counsel for the USCC/NCCB stated that the “USCC/NCCB have asked me to advise the Court that they cannot, in conscience, comply with the subpoenas in question.” The USCC/NCCB are unquestionably in contempt; what is at issue is their bona fides during this protracted discovery dispute. Plaintiffs charge the USCC/NCCB with bad faith;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc. v. ReganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc. v. ReganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc. v. ReganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Danielson v. United Seafood Workers Smoked Fish & Cannery Union, Local 359District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re United States Catholic ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In Re United States Catholic ConferenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Abortion Rights Mobilization Inc. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987