Legal Opinion
Bohemian Club v. Fair Employment & Housing Com.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1986No. A024988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
The Department of Fair Employment and Housing (hereafter Department) filed an accusation against the Bohemian Club (hereafter Club) for alleged violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (hereafter FEHA). The accusation alleged that the Club, as an employer covered by the FEHA, had—in violation of the act—pursued a discriminatory hiring policy which systematically excluded women from all temporary and permanent jobs at its Monte Rio camp and most of such positions at its San Francisco location.
The Club denied that it is a covered employer, and, in the alternative,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- PEOPLE EX REL. KERR v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Fisher v. Quaker Oats Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Green v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Bearden v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.