Legal Opinion

Francois v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 1, 1983No. C-83-2737 RFPPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

PECKHAM, Chief Judge.

SUMMARY

The defendants in this asbestos action have filed three motions to dismiss: (1) a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; and (3) a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The first two motions (lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim) have been made by various defendants, 1 while the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction has been raised by a single defendant. 2

The plaintiff in this action originally worked at Mare…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Francois (Clarence) v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Owens-Illinois Corp., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Celotox Corp., Armstrong Cork Company, Nicolet Industries, Inc., H.K. Porter Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API