Legal Opinion

Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1995No. BOLI 29-90; CA A68770; SC S40567Published

1Opinion of the Court

903 P.2d 351 (1995)

322 Or. 132

James V. MELTEBEKE, Respondent on Review,

v.

BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, State of Oregon, Petitioner on Review.

BOLI 29-90; CA A68770; SC S40567.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted March 9, 1994.

Decided October 5, 1995.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Kelly E. Ford, Beaverton, argued the cause for respondent on review.

David K. Allen and Richard C. Busse, Salem, filed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Epperson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API