Legal Opinion · Dissent

Austerberry v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1948No. 10515Published

1DissentMiller, Circuit Judge

I am of the opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed.

The rule is well settled that while an appeal in Admiralty is a trial de novo, the findings of the district court will be accepted unless clearly against the preponderance of evidence. Johnson v. Kosmos Portland Cement Co., 6 Cir., 64 F.2d 193, and cases therein cited. The credibility of witnesses is primarily a matter for the District Judge. The Eleanore, 6 Cir., 248 F. 472; The Knoxville City, 9 Cir., 112 F.2d 223. The District Judge, in dismissing the claims of the appellants, found that there was no credible…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coryell v. PhippsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Johnson v. Kosmos Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  4. Isthmian S. S. Co. v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. The EleanoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API