Legal Opinion
In re Ronny
New York Family Court
Decided August 23, 1963PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMillard L. Midomick, J.
The problems presented in this matter are so basic, and in certain respects so novel, that an opinion is deemed advisable.
The problems herein arise from two sources:
A — The requirement of corroboration for extrajudicial confessions of children under the Family Court Act.
B — The duties and limitations upon peace officers with respect to searches and seizures.
This respondent boy, concededly 15 years of age, is charged in the petition with the following conduct: “ On or about July 19, 1963, at about 6:30 p.m., at the corner of 14th Street and 31st Avenue, New York, and elsewhere in Astoria,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Cleary v. BolgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. UrbasekIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- In re AglerOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Pueblo ex rel. N.O.R.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Nieves v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Harvey AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.