Legal Opinion
United States v. Krasinski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 19, 2008No. 07-1965PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Piotr Krasinski raises several challenges to the sentence he received for conspiring to distribute Ecstasy and conspiring to launder monetary instruments. We find none persuasive. First, we reject his challenge to the enhancement he received under U.S.S.G. § 2Sl.l(b)(2)(B) because the transfer of money from the United States to Canada to pay for the pills he supplied “promoted the carrying on” of the drug conspiracy. Next, the district court did not clearly err when it estimated the number of pills attributable to Krasinski by performing a calculation based on the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Robert MykytiukCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Rebecca S. DemareeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- United States v. TrejoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. LongstreetCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. AlviarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RedmondCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.