Legal Opinion

Haupt v. Midland National Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 14, 1990No. 89-135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

Peggy Short Haupt, individually; as ad-ministratrix of the estate of her husband, William M. Haupt, Jr.; and as next friend of her minor daughter, Jennifer Haupt; filed an action against Midland National Life Insurance Company (“Midland”) and other defendants. She alleged breach of contract, conspiracy to defraud, outrage, negligence, and bad faith in relation to Midland’s refusal to pay the proceeds of a life insurance policy that she claims insured her husband. The trial court entered a summary judgment on Haupt’s claims against Midland and made that judgment final pursuant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grimes v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Sarah Ethel WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Stark v. Illinois Bankers Life Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  2. Boyd v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Ware v. Columbus Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023
  4. Ware v. Columbus Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API