Miranda Rose Mraz v. The State of Wyoming

KITE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] A jury found Miranda Rose Mraz guilty of larceny by bailee. She appeals her conviction claiming the district court erred in excluding alternate suspect evidence and giving an improper jury instruction. She also claims the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the conviction. We conclude the evidence was insufficient to support a guilty verdict; we, therefore, reverse the conviction.

ISSUE

[¶2] The dispositive issue is whether sufficient evidence was presented to support the jury's verdict.

FACTS

[¶3] In July of 2012, the Sheridan County attorney's office…