Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gold

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1936No. Appeal, 44PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The defendant was found guilty on an indictment containing two counts, charging the obtaining of money by false pretences and larceny by trick. A motion for a new trial having been refused and sentence having been imposed, defendant has appealed to this court. We are all of the opinion that the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

The first count of the indictment charged that by reason of trickery and fraud Joseph Gold, alias Joseph Goldberg, alias Mr. Weber did feloniously steal, take and carry away $620 of lawful money, property of Donald K. Belt. The second count…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McManusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Commonwealth v. EichelbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Commonwealth v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Kane v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  5. Commonwealth v. GabelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TraceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. De RohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API