Legal Opinion

Bonvillain v. Penn

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 25, 1912No. 19,186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary; Charles A. O’Neil, Judge. In the matter of the intervention and- third opposition of Robert Penn in suit of Albert Bonvillain against Robert Penn; J. Sully Martel being called in warranty. From a judgment in favor of the intervener and third opponent, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

Plaintiff caused executory process to issue on five vendor’s lien notes of $580 each, dated October 14, 1905, and made payable in one, two, three, four, and five years after date, with interest at 8 per cent., which interest had been paid up to January 1, 1911. The defendant “intervened,” alleging that the property affected was his home, and that he owns no other property; that the seizing creditor owns the notes sued on and two others for $2,202.98 and $2,745.04, respectively, and that there are no other mortgage debts; that his father and mother live with and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duff v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. First Nat. Bank of Lake Charles v. LanzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
  3. Billy Reed Kilgo, Bankrupt v. United Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API