Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Oklahoma Horse Racing Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 16, 1996No. 75822PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
Two issues are before us: 1) whether there was substantial evidence to support the Oklahoma Horse Racing Commission’s order fining and suspending trainer Jack Wilson, Sr., and 2) whether Wilson received a fair and impartial hearing. In light of our finding that the trainer did not receive a fair and impartial hearing where one of the adjudicators also testified in the ease, we need not answer the first question.
Jack Benton Wilson, Sr. was the trainer of Dazzle Dixie, a horse entered in the Oklahoma Derby at Blue Ribbon Downs on May 1, 1988. On April 29, 1988, Wilson’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jon Tom Staton v. James K. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Beer Garden, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lowrey v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bradley v. State Ex Rel. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- STATE EX REL. OKL. DEPT. OF MINES v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- In re the Non-Reemployment of Isch v. Oklahoma Independent School District No. I-89Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Department v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.