Legal Opinion
Stott v. Hinkle
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided April 22, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Cammack
— Reversing-
The appellees in these three cases claim that they suffered painful injuries to their bodies and nerves when the car in which they were riding, and which was being-driven by Mrs. Mae Hinkle, was struck by a car being-driven by Archie Stott, December 1, 1938. Both cars were proceeding- in the same direction and it is contended that Stott’s car struck Mrs. Hinkle’s car as he was cutting- it back to the right side of the road after pulling- to the left to pass. It was alleged that Mrs. Hinkle was driving her car to the right of the center of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Star Furniture Co. v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Helton v. Prater's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Randle v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Indian Refining Co. v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wright v. KinslowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Nickell v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Ideal Pure Milk Co. v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
- Terminal Transport Company v. John P. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Dixie-Ohio Express Co., Inc. v. Webb, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.