Legal Opinion

Kite Consolidated School District v. Clark

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1930No. 7666PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, ,J.

1. Prior to the act of the legislature approved April 17, 1926 (Ga. L. 1926, p. 38), the trustees of local school districts were not authorized by law to borrow money for defraying the expenses of operating schools in such districts. Baggerly v. Bainbridge State Bank, 160 Ga. 556 (128 S. E. 766).

2. Even before the passage of the act of 1926, supra, the Supreme Court held: “Where money borrowed by the trustees of a school district was used in defraying the lawful current expenses of operating a school in such district for the year 1924, to the payment of which expenses school funds of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baggerly v. Bainbridge State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Powell v. Bainbridge State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Kite Consolidated School District v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Board of Edu. of Candler Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API