Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Wilder

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1944No. 4-7378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The parties to this suit are non-residents of Arkansas, residing in North 'Carolina. Appellant, Mary Glover Wilder, is insane, and appears by her nephew, A. G. Glover, as next friend, he also being a non-resident. February 21, 1940, a decree of divorce against appellant was granted appellee by the Garland Chancery Court upon constructive service.

November 16, 1943, appellant, by her next friend, A. G. Glover, filed a complaint in the same court in which the divorce decree was rendered, asking the' court to set aside that decree on the ground that appellee, her husband, practiced a fraud on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. PotterSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HaistSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  3. Missouri State Life Insurance v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Serio v. SerioSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Dodd v. HoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Hernández Torres ex rel. Zapater Hernández v. Zapater MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  3. Wilder v. WilderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. Banks v. HowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  5. Hernández Torres v. Zapater MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API