Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Craig

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 1978No. 76-2294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants challenge the amount of damages awarded in a personal injury case. The trial court denied a motion for a new trial or a remittitur, which decision indicates that the trial court did not feel that the verdict was excessive or such as to shock the judicial conscience.

We have examined the record and the evidence and considered the arguments and case law urged. It is our view that the damages awarded were within reasonable limits and amply justified by the evidence at trial. We are unable to determine any legal basis whereby this court would be entitled to disturb the jury’s decision…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Vincent's Hospital, Incorporated v. CrouchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Popham v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Cleere v. HumphreysDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DIAZ BY RIVAS v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Leibiski v. Concord Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API