Legal Opinion

Conlan v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1910No. Civ. No. 779PublishedCited by 4 opinions

PETITION for writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

It is sought by the petitioner herein to obtain a writ of prohibition against the superior court -of the city and county of San Francisco, in an election contest pending in said court, against the petitioner, who has been declared elected to the office of police judge of said city.

It is claimed that the superior court has no jurisdiction to proceed with the contest, for the reason that the citation was not served upon petitioner.

■ The code provides (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1119) that the citation may be served upon the party in person, or, if he cannot be found, by leaving a copy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chatham v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Benson v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Skeen v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  4. City of Pasadena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API