Darlington Iron Co. v. Foote

Without attempting to recapitulate the propositions and countei'-propositions contained in the correspondence by letters *647and cablegrams between the parties, the conclusion is reached that the minds of the parties finally met, and they became reciprocally obligated in a contract.

On the fifth day of March, 1881, after many letters and cablegrams had been exchanged between the parties, the defendant wrote to plaintiff’s agents: “I note our misunderstanding of each other’s cablegrams. Subsequent acts have produced a correct understanding and removed doubtful details of the 10,000 tons contract.”…