State v. Finch
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
We are asked to grant a mandamus ordering the trial judge to enter judgment upon a verdict which was returned in open court and received by the court. The trial court received the verdict and discharged the jury, but granted a motion for mistrial filed several days later. The mandamus is proper.
Remi Aelvoet and wife, respondents, with the State’s permission, sued the State, Bexar County, and the State Highway Department, relators. The suit was for the recovery of damages to their property. The court submitted two issues, and the jury answered both of them. Upon the basis of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Southland-Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Cortimeglia v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Owens v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Branham v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- Security State Bank and Trust v. CraigheadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Robertson Tank Lines, Inc. v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Jones v. Square Deal Cab CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Van Wart v. Van WartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.