Spann v. Lauritzen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOOD, District Judge.
We have before us a non-jury action brought by the original defendant (shipowner) against the third-party defendant (stevedore) seeking indemnity for attorneys’ fees and expenses involved in the litigation.
We do not propose to make extended findings of fact and conclusions of law since they were stated from the bench to a large degree and also, and more importantly, the suggested findings of fact submitted by the parties are in agreement, and we will direct the Clerk to file them as part of the record. Unfortunately, neither party ordered the notes of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robert Spann v. J. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Famous Rogers v. United States Lines Company, and Third-Party v. E. J. Lavino & Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Spann v. LauritzenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964