Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Cleveland Cty. Headstart

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided June 27, 2005No. I.C. NO. 970995Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Berger and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Berger, with modifications.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Clark v. Wal-MartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API