Legal Opinion

United States v. Sentry Insurance

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 17, 1997No. Court No. 94-03-00173PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment, claiming Sentry Insurance, A Mutual Company (“Sentry”), is liable to the U.S. Customs Service (“Customs”) for unpaid amounts pursuant to a Vessel, Vehicle, or Aircraft Bond (Single Entry) ("Bond ”) related to foreign repairs made on an American vessel that Trinidad Corporation (“Trinidad”), as principal, and Sentry, as surety, executed and delivered to Customs. Customs contends it is due a total of $24,818.21 in duties plus interest, costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees from Sentry under the Bond. Sentry cross-moves for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. In Re Teerlink Ranch Ltd., a California Limited Partnership, Debtor. Heber N. Teerlink Erma D. Teerlink v. Alan G. Lambert, and Teerlink Ranch Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States Customs Service v. Apex Oil Co. (In Re Apex Oil Co.)District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
  5. Apex Oil Co. v. United States Customs Service (In Re Apex Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Washington International InsuranceUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API