Legal Opinion

Gentleman v. Sanitary District

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appral from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. Edgar Eldrrdgr, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The appellee recovered a judgment against the Sanitary District of Chicago for $5000 damages to his land by overflowing it. After verdict and judgment the court, on motion of the plaintiff, assessed attorneys’ fees in his favor to the amount of $5000, to be taxed as costs. The title to the land was in issue under the pleadings and the defendant appealed directly to this court. The only question presented is the allowance of attorneys’ fees and their amount.

The objection to the allowance 'of any attorneys’ fees is based upon the proposition that section 19 of the act under which the Sanitary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodwillie v. MillimannIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Reynolds v. McMillanIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Sanitary District v. RayIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re Estate of JamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  3. Sanitary District v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Morrison v. Farmers Elevator Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Town of Cicero v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API